Michael Graves' Portland Building faces threat of demolition

News: Michael Graves’ seminal Portland Public Solutions Developing will be spared from demolition, in spite of becoming described as a “white elephant” and requiring an estimated \$95 million for renovation.

Also known as the Portland Building, the 15-storey office block in Portland, Oregon, will continue to supply facilities for 1,300 of the city’s staff with a redesign that will incorporate input from the original architect.

“It’s going to be saved,” Graves told the Architect’s Newspaper Weblog. “They told me… They mentioned they are saving the constructing and not only that but we want you to sit on a committee for the redesign.” Graves recommended that operate could start on the creating in 2015.

Related story: “History does change perception”

The AN Weblog stated that the news had been confirmed by Dana Haynes, communications director for Portland mayor Charlie Hales. Haynes said that the city’s officials would start to make a decision how considerably money and resource to allocate to the project in the course of the annual capital budget procedure in January.

The Portland Creating was completed by American firm Michael Graves &amp Associates in 1982 at a expense of about \$25 million (£16 million) and is regarded a single of the most crucial buildings of the Postmodernism movement.

The creating stands out in a city where the architecture is largely sedate and unadorned, with a teal, cream and salmon facade and a selection of decorative flourishes.

Michael Graves' Portland Building faces threat of demolition

It was described by architecture historian Charles Jencks as “the first main monument of Postmodernism, just as the Bauhaus was of Modernism, due to the fact with all its faults it nonetheless is the initial to show that a single can build with art, ornament, and symbolism on a grand scale, and in a language the inhabitants understand.”

The constructing was added to the USA’s National Register of Historic Places in 2011.

Dezeen reported at the starting of 2014 that it was getting regarded as for the wrecking ball, following an analysis of the building’s situation, which estimated that a complete overhaul of the developing would cost \$95 million (£61 million).

The report also identified that replacing the constructing or relocating the offices could cost something between \$110 million (£71 million) and \$400 million (£257 million).

At the time, city commissioners branded it a “white elephant” and had been considering pulling down each the Portland Creating and a neighbouring courthouse to make way for a new public solutions development.

“My reaction is we ought to generally tear it down and construct something new,” extended-standing commissioner Dan Saltzman told local newspaper The Oregonian, describing the creating as “a nightmare for men and women who function there”.

“There is got to be a better alternative than putting another \$one hundred million into a white elephant,” added Nick Fish, who oversees the city’s water and environmental services bureaus.


Graves, who is a special adviser on accessible design and style to President Obama’s administration and whose Postmodernist homeware – created by brands like Alessi – has proven enduringly common, campaigned to save the constructing.

In November, he gave a public talk in Portland exactly where he defended the building, describing it as “shimmering” and “uplifting”.

According to a report published by The Oregonian, Graves admitted that his creating may not give the most pleasant perform atmosphere, but blamed low ceiling heights on budget restrictions.

“I’d like the likelihood to do a single floor appropriately – lights, carpets, ceilings, furniture… I’d like to make a place out of it. It’s a terrible spot to operate, I suspect,” he stated.  “The whole notion of tearing the creating down, it’s like killing a youngster.”

Architecture critic Alexandra Lange also argued for preservation of the constructing on purely aesthetic grounds, in a column for Dezeen.

Postmodernism is not, now, our style, but are we really comfortable demolishing its most prominent exemplar?” she wrote. “By defining what is worth preserving about this constructing as symbolic, almost as thin as a cookie tin’s walls, there’s a possibility to make it into a developing that can work as architecture and not just a striking two-dimensional image.”

Graves stated that public debate over the developing had helped to save it. “I believe that was a big element of it,” he said. “They didn’t want to be recognized as the society that tore down the Portland Creating.”



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here