Comments update: designers like Thomas Heatherwick are increasingly encroaching on architects’ territory, sparking a lively debate amid readers about the implications for the created environment. Read a lot more on this and the other most commented stories on Dezeen.
Designers v architects: numerous readers strongly disagreed with Heatherwick’s declare that designing a creating was “exactly the exact same” as designing a Christmas card.
“He must have some gravitas and acknowledge that the difficulty-solving in architecture has to do with space and not objects,” argued one commenter. “Architecture yields to kind but it is not the point in itself.”
“Urban arranging will spiral out of control if left to designers,” agreed James. “They may possibly strategy difficulties in a distinct way, but there’s far more to becoming an architect than making things seem quite.”
Other people thought designers were more likely to have fresh concepts than architects who are held back by architectural conventions.
“Designers are free from the rigid training of architects,” explained a guest commenter. “This allows them to create authentic structures that resolve troubles in new techniques”. Read through the remarks on this story »
Tour Triangle Tower by Herzog & de Meuron
Sacré bleu: Herzog & de Meuron dominated headlines last week, unveiling strategies for the redesign of the Chelsea FC stadium and winning permission to build Paris’ 1st skyscraper for 40 years. But will the 180-metre-higher Tour Triangle be a dud, or grow to be a considerably-loved landmark?
“Herzog & de Meuron’s failed attempt to replicate the allure of the Eiffel tower,” said one reader. “So prolonged to the refinement of Paris.”
“Context? We never need context,” wrote Chris sarcastically, whilst other people expressed shock that city planners had accepted the layout.
Even so, not everyone was towards the task. “[The Tour Triangle is] a modern Parisian icon that will rival the Eiffel Tower and the Pompidou Centre,” said regular Dezeen commenter, James. Read the feedback on this story »
PTM DIY Tattoo Machine by Jakub Pollag
Tit for tat: a do-it-yourself tattoo machine prompted a powerful reaction from readers. Some were against the idea of tattooing altogether, even though other individuals defended them as an expression of creativity.
“Tattoos are for the superficial who lack self-manage and intelligence,” mentioned Jade. “Judging individuals on their skin is the definition of superficial, absolutely?” retorted Kim.
Other people considered tattooing was best left to specialists. “A tattoo machine is not a pen,” wrote Joshua Youthful. “It is a extremely distinct artist’s tool that requires a great deal of expertise.”
Alana Robbie – an seasoned tattooer – likened the device to a “house dentistry kit”. Go through the remarks on this story »
Beyoncé-inspired Premiere Tower by Elenberg Fraser
Can you deal with this? Australian firm Elenberg Fraser won approval for a 226-metre-higher Melbourne skyscraper style inspired by Beyoncé. Not all commenters were crazy in enjoy with the proposal.
“Utilizing a contemporary pop star to justify the kind of a constructing is a slap in the face,” stated Archi-Nerd. “Not to mention a huge step backwards in the campaign to legitimise personal computer-aided form generating.”
“Why does architecture constantly have to be so detached from popular culture?” replied Davvid. “The more approaches that we can connect with the urban surroundings, the better.”
“It’ll give very good publicity and interest to the creating,” concluded Charles Garrett. “Very good style and cultural relevance.” Read the feedback on this story »