Comments update: a crowdfunding campaign for “modular parasitic sleeping pods” for homeless individuals produced the most debate this week. Read on for much more on this and discover our comments page to maintain up to date with the most recent discussions.
Gimme shelter: architectural designer James Furzer’s Houses for the Homeless proposed a structure that could hang off the side of existing buildings in London, but not every person was convinced the style could make a difference.
“How would you regulate to end city workers nabbing them for low-cost rent – particularly in Mayfair, Buckingham Palace, Dolphin Square, Downing Street, and Whitehall – and doing that factor of modifying costumes in the locker rooms?” asked Roughsleeper.
“It tackles the symptom rather than the problem, and would seem to encourage isolationism and marginalisation,” stated Ralph Kent .”In this regard, it could be mentioned to be a very architectural task.”
“There is a consistent and constant want for architects and designers to pretend to engage and assist the homeless by delivering a home,” added Eynak East. “This is shortsighted and arrogant, enabling little much more than a warm fuzzy feeling for us pondering we’re performing something positive. We’re not.”
“Maybe we could give the homeless real houses to reside in,” suggested Brendan. “It is been experimented with ahead of, and apparently, it works.” Read the remarks on this story »
Pie in the sky? a proposal for a London “sky pool” suspended among two apartment blocks 10 storeys over the ground raised queries about feasibility.
“Not going to happen. At least not the way it truly is pictured,” said Kevin Carney. “That is 316 tons of water they are speaking about over the tops of people strolling/driving beneath. No opportunity.”
“If efficiently developed, this would be a enormous breakthrough in structural glass engineering,” additional a a lot more optimistic bnh_b.
Other readers were concerned that the pool would only be accessible to those ready to afford the value of the apartments, suggesting the design was a symptom of growing inequality.
“There are some wealthy folk all around who like to develop extravagant factors with their dosh, get more than it,” stated sick-liberal. Study the remarks on this story »
Stacked: a concept for two skyscrapers designed to exchange slum developments employing stacks of shipping containers angered readers.
“Please end developing 3D-rendered models of shipping containers undertaking things that shipping containers are not able to do,” explained SteveLeo.
Some were much more concerned with the assumptions created about slum housing.
“A slum is a location exactly where folks have created their very own residence,” additional Slumdog. “There is no one on earth who would like his own property to be demolished.”
“This should have been scrapped following 5 minutes,” agreed Kevin McGrath. “It isn’t going to operate on so several ranges, not even a poor joke.” Read the remarks on this story »
House v residence: this Japanese property by Fuse Atelier divided readers. Many loved the exterior, but weren’t convinced the home would make a cozy property.
“This property is all movement, largely stair,” said one particular guest commenter. “Homes need spaces that elicit calm, along with a feeling of protected haven.”
Derek was among the design’s defenders: “From the outside, you’d consider it was a prison inside but there is in fact tons of light and open room to the sky.”
“It appears like something a Kazakhstani oligarch would give to his pet tiger for its 16th birthday. I adore it,” concluded normal commenter Colonel Pancake. Study the comments on this story »