The End of History Beer packaging by BrewDog design dezeen

Feedback update: the use of taxidermy in design was thrust into the spotlight this week after we re-posted a 2010 project by BrewDog to our Instagram account as component of a Halloween-themed weekend of articles. The controversial submit attracted in excess of 600 feedback, sparking a debate about the use of dead animals in the creation of decorative objects.

Stuffed: all the animals employed in BrewDog’s collection, referred to as The Finish of Background, died of normal brings about. But this truth didn’t alter the viewpoint of numerous readers who expressed their distaste at true animals – dead or alive – currently being utilised for packaging.

“No matter how they died, to display and use animals in this way is past disrespectful and totally disgusting,” wrote Pinecrowprints.

A lot of of our Instagram followers agreed. “Surprising to see Dezeen advertise anything like this,” mentioned Cheeders, although Williams described the publish on Instagram as “social roadkill”.

“All of you are so rapid to contact this ‘disgusting’,” retorted Vevahu. “Most of you eat animals slaughtered and tortured all their lives just to feed you.”

“I love the picture nearly as a lot as I enjoy the torrent of outrage underneath it,” additional Southtopia. Read the comments on Instagram »

Dutch furniture designer Piet Hein Eek“Most buildings are drawings filled in by engineers” says Piet Hein Eek

Architects vs Eek: Dutch furnishings designer Piet Hein Eek waded into the ongoing debate about whether or not non-architects should layout buildings. Eek, who is currently operating on a quantity of architectural tasks, explained numerous architects do small more than create drawings.

“Architects are interested and involved in everything related with how buildings come collectively,” replied 1 angry reader. “That first line about how architects just make rather pictures and then [depart] the rest to engineers is not correct and, frankly, offensive.”

Some described Eek’s remarks as “disappointing” and “simplistic”, while other individuals defended the Dutch designer’s claim.

“Properly, he is partially proper,” wrote a guest commenter calling themselves MRA, who recommended that architecture schools ought to area more emphasis on educating building tactics. “If we never do this, it really is going to finish up becoming the finish of the profession thanks to non-architects performing what an architect should be performing.” Read through the remarks on this story »

Kindergarten and crèche by Pierre-Alain DuprazKindergarten and crèche by Pierre-Alain Dupraz

College of Challenging Knocks: the exposed concrete interior of this Swiss kindergarten shocked plenty of readers who felt the interior style was too austere for kids.

“Is the architect aware that a kindergarten is for youngsters?” asked Anna. “As in kids only a handful of years old, who like colour and drawings on walls, and who haven’t presently received a degree in interior design and style.”

“Why does architecture for children often have to default to the circus?” replied C Fay. “Surely youngsters add all the colour and daily life.”

“There is concrete proof that tells us youthful youngsters need extremely neutral spaces in which to discover,” added Rosie. “I would love the opportunity to educate and learn in a setting like this a single.” Read the feedback on this story »

Relevant story: Dezeen Mail issue 277 characteristics a choice of this week’s best stories and discussions

Latest stories:

Pin it |



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here